NTSB .05 BAC Recommendation Stirs Controversy in DUI Community - Sobering Up
In baby boy names the weeks since the National baby boy names Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) submitted a recommendation to lower the legal BAC limit for drivers from 0.08 to 0.05 BAC, commentary from politicians, lobbying groups, the media, and the general public has been wide-spread.
The general consensus is that alcohol-related accidents are still far too frequent in the U.S.: over 1.4 million Americans are arrested each year for driving while impaired and 9,878 people were killed in drunk driving accidents in 2011.
But that s where the agreement seems to end. The NTSB s recommendation has received resistance from groups as diverse as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) , American Beverage Institute , law enforcement agencies and law-makers. baby boy names Here are some of the critics baby boy names arguments against lowering the drunk-driving BAC: It targets responsible drinkers rather than addressing baby boy names the real problem: hardcore and repeat drunk drivers. The NTSB points to research showing even a 0.05 BAC raises the risk of a crash; however, critics state that the majority of alcohol-related road fatalities involve drivers with BAC levels well above the current legal limit. The message should be no BAC rather than a lower BAC. Some argue that no amount of alcohol consumption is safe before a person drives. Lowering the BAC limit for drivers reinforces our culture s attitude that some drinking and driving is acceptable. baby boy names It would be difficult to identify and prosecute drivers with a BAC of less than 0.08. Some law enforcement agencies claim many drivers don t exhibit behaviors baby boy names that would lead to a traffic stop at 0.05 BAC. In addition, l owering the BAC level will not increase enforcement of drunk-driving laws. Currently officers can only stop a fraction of people who drive drunk, and changing the permissible BAC for drivers will not increase stops or arrests . Law enforcement officers can already issue citations for someone who is driving erratically or unsafely even if their BAC is less than 0.08. States had a difficult time reducing baby boy names the BAC limit for drivers from 0.1 to 0.08 BAC; a further reduction is unlikely to receive the support it needs to become law . There are far more effective ways to reduce drunk driving , such as ignition interlocks. baby boy names .05 BAC Only One of 19 Recommendations
It is important baby boy names to note that lowering the BAC for drunk driving is just one of the NTSB s 19 recommendations baby boy names for ending drunk driving a recognition of the complexity of the problem. This is the first in a series of blog posts where I ll cover each of the NTSB s five safety issue areas, which include: Reducing the per se BAC limit for all drivers Conducting high-visibility enforcement of impaired driving laws that incorporates passive alcohol sensing technology baby boy names Expanding the use of in-vehicle devices to prevent operation by an impaired driver Using DWI Courts and other programs to reduce recidivism by repeat DWI offenders Establishing goals for reducing impaired driving and measuring progress toward those goals
24/7 Programs , Alcohol Addiction/Dependence , Drug, DWI, and Specialty Courts , Drunk/Impaired Driving , General , Ignition Interlock , Law Enforcement , Legislation , NTSB , Public Policy , Reaching Zero , Societal Costs , The Hardcore baby boy names Drunk Driver
.05 BAC , alcohol-impaired driving baby boy names , American Beverage Institute , drunk driving , dui , DUI Courts , DWI , feature , madd , National Transportation Safety Board , NTSB , Reaching Zero: Actions to Eliminate Alcohol-Impaired Driving
I personally do not believe anyone should be allowed to drink and drive. If you are going to drink then have a designated driver. If it were your child at risk would you want to chance it. Also, everyone tolerates Alcohol differently so someone could be really affected at .05, when others might not be affected enough to show with a .08. It’s about not DRINKING AND DRIVING AT ALL. Zero tolerance. You Drink You Dont Drive. My Opinion of course.
I also believe stiffer jail time, community service might help things as well. Money doesn’t seem to matter, since they don’t pay anyway. But having to work for free for longer periods of time.
I personally am amazed that everyone is missing the true issue: alcohol is a drug. At the risk of sounding like a prohibitionist, we need to better regulate the makers and distributors. We currently arrest baby boy names people for possession of marihuana (any amount) but when was the last time you heard of someone arrested for causing an accident baby boy names or taking a life as a result of DUI – marihuana? Heroin? Cocaine? Alcohol is as serious a drug as any on the planet and it is as addictive as any of them BUT IT S LEGAL to possess and imbibe. It becomes illegal when too much is ingested but since some have more tolerance than others Alcohol distillers and distributors make billions of dollars a year selling a drug that we have little to no a
In baby boy names the weeks since the National baby boy names Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) submitted a recommendation to lower the legal BAC limit for drivers from 0.08 to 0.05 BAC, commentary from politicians, lobbying groups, the media, and the general public has been wide-spread.
The general consensus is that alcohol-related accidents are still far too frequent in the U.S.: over 1.4 million Americans are arrested each year for driving while impaired and 9,878 people were killed in drunk driving accidents in 2011.
But that s where the agreement seems to end. The NTSB s recommendation has received resistance from groups as diverse as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) , American Beverage Institute , law enforcement agencies and law-makers. baby boy names Here are some of the critics baby boy names arguments against lowering the drunk-driving BAC: It targets responsible drinkers rather than addressing baby boy names the real problem: hardcore and repeat drunk drivers. The NTSB points to research showing even a 0.05 BAC raises the risk of a crash; however, critics state that the majority of alcohol-related road fatalities involve drivers with BAC levels well above the current legal limit. The message should be no BAC rather than a lower BAC. Some argue that no amount of alcohol consumption is safe before a person drives. Lowering the BAC limit for drivers reinforces our culture s attitude that some drinking and driving is acceptable. baby boy names It would be difficult to identify and prosecute drivers with a BAC of less than 0.08. Some law enforcement agencies claim many drivers don t exhibit behaviors baby boy names that would lead to a traffic stop at 0.05 BAC. In addition, l owering the BAC level will not increase enforcement of drunk-driving laws. Currently officers can only stop a fraction of people who drive drunk, and changing the permissible BAC for drivers will not increase stops or arrests . Law enforcement officers can already issue citations for someone who is driving erratically or unsafely even if their BAC is less than 0.08. States had a difficult time reducing baby boy names the BAC limit for drivers from 0.1 to 0.08 BAC; a further reduction is unlikely to receive the support it needs to become law . There are far more effective ways to reduce drunk driving , such as ignition interlocks. baby boy names .05 BAC Only One of 19 Recommendations
It is important baby boy names to note that lowering the BAC for drunk driving is just one of the NTSB s 19 recommendations baby boy names for ending drunk driving a recognition of the complexity of the problem. This is the first in a series of blog posts where I ll cover each of the NTSB s five safety issue areas, which include: Reducing the per se BAC limit for all drivers Conducting high-visibility enforcement of impaired driving laws that incorporates passive alcohol sensing technology baby boy names Expanding the use of in-vehicle devices to prevent operation by an impaired driver Using DWI Courts and other programs to reduce recidivism by repeat DWI offenders Establishing goals for reducing impaired driving and measuring progress toward those goals
24/7 Programs , Alcohol Addiction/Dependence , Drug, DWI, and Specialty Courts , Drunk/Impaired Driving , General , Ignition Interlock , Law Enforcement , Legislation , NTSB , Public Policy , Reaching Zero , Societal Costs , The Hardcore baby boy names Drunk Driver
.05 BAC , alcohol-impaired driving baby boy names , American Beverage Institute , drunk driving , dui , DUI Courts , DWI , feature , madd , National Transportation Safety Board , NTSB , Reaching Zero: Actions to Eliminate Alcohol-Impaired Driving
I personally do not believe anyone should be allowed to drink and drive. If you are going to drink then have a designated driver. If it were your child at risk would you want to chance it. Also, everyone tolerates Alcohol differently so someone could be really affected at .05, when others might not be affected enough to show with a .08. It’s about not DRINKING AND DRIVING AT ALL. Zero tolerance. You Drink You Dont Drive. My Opinion of course.
I also believe stiffer jail time, community service might help things as well. Money doesn’t seem to matter, since they don’t pay anyway. But having to work for free for longer periods of time.
I personally am amazed that everyone is missing the true issue: alcohol is a drug. At the risk of sounding like a prohibitionist, we need to better regulate the makers and distributors. We currently arrest baby boy names people for possession of marihuana (any amount) but when was the last time you heard of someone arrested for causing an accident baby boy names or taking a life as a result of DUI – marihuana? Heroin? Cocaine? Alcohol is as serious a drug as any on the planet and it is as addictive as any of them BUT IT S LEGAL to possess and imbibe. It becomes illegal when too much is ingested but since some have more tolerance than others Alcohol distillers and distributors make billions of dollars a year selling a drug that we have little to no a
No comments:
Post a Comment