Nicolas Sarkozy the American, France and the control of social minima The US and Saudi: diplomatic

Hello, Thank you for your visit and comment, if you will write in my notes. Thank you to respect the rules set by the Tribune star signs de Genève that hosts us: be courteous, concise, relevant and sign your comment! Hope to hear from you. You can also reach me here
Silvia Nicolas Sarkozy on the American Myriam Belakovsky on France and the control of social minima Victor Liviu Dumitrescu on France and the control of Corto social minima on Jean-Marie Le Pen and Marine Le Pen on Belakovsky Myriam Jean-Marie Le Pen Marine Le Pen and Victor Liviu Dumitrescu on Jean-Marie Le Pen and Marine Le Pen Lambert star signs on May 1 in France Corto In that day Israel celebrates star signs those who are on william ... The sense of independence Israel on Serum The meaning of Israel's independence
Nicolas Sarkozy the American, France and the control of social minima The US and Saudi: diplomatic odd ... The underside of the reform of Education Cuba and France star signs Barack Obama, the twilight of the gods. .. What will the future of the National Front? The legal position of Nicolas Sarkozy What will be the life of the new ... Europe and immigration populations not ...
"France and carefree holiday, the war against the Islamic State | Homepage | The drama of Christians of the Orient" 02/26/2015 Religious discourse and philosophical discourse: it does exist a gateway?
The prophetic religious message or it can be translated into as rational or philosophical terms? Preliminaries: it is the postulate of any Religionsphilosophie of any religious philosophy to the extent that the term has a meaning: this postulate had convinced supporters but also fierce opponents. For the first we especially mention the medieval thinkers, Maimonides and his followers among the Jews, al Farabi, Ibn Badja, Averroes and Ibn Tufayl among Muslims. For opponents, star signs just to name Spinoza who has always campaigned against such a mix of genres: for him, theology and philosophy, revelation and reason must be separated from each other if each wants to save his dignity own. Any mixture would undermine the fullness of one or the other. But this would not thrust produced without the Greek element that confronted religions revealed after the Arab-Islamic conquests: the new masters, star signs very happy on the battlefield, also had to fend off armies of doctrinal opponents, coming absolutely different backgrounds. For a Greek polytheist, a term like revelation means nothing ... Any medieval philosophy, as we shall see, is based on this premise: star signs the message of Revelation, essentially religious, therefore, can be divided into rational and philosophical terms. This means that there is a convertible, a bridge between théologoumènes (religious and theological concepts) and philosophemes. What is the meaning of this equivalence? star signs This is the philosophy of language that we book transcendence, the deity speaks infinitely richer language than the human linguistic medium, which means that interpretation, so the conversion to another language, is imperative, absolutely necessary. At Maimonides, the great figure of reconciliation between revelation and reason, between theology and philosophy, from the introduction to the Guide for the Perplexed, there is an equivalence between the work of creation (Bereishit massaged) and Aristotle's Physics and work of the char (massaged merkaba) and Metaphysics. So it is a pure question of language, the essence of the subjects is the same. The above is grafted a societal problem: simple men whom the revelation is intended star signs would not understand the truth in his brilliant but also blinding clarity. It was therefore necessary to dress these truths envelopes within their intellectual poverty, star signs use of metaphors, images and parables to these ubiquitous star signs in the prophetic speech as the philosopher, star signs he has scarcely need. The Religionsphilosophen therefore recommend a philosophical reading of the revealed texts because for them the revelation is a simple truths exposure mode, there is one other, but for much clearer understanding of which it must have been prepared., Philosophy. There is therefore a natural bridge between these two branches of knowledge. Critics star signs of this theory. In intellectualizing the prophetic speech, based on Revelation, summarizing to concepts that says transcendence, it impoverishes some divine message to the prophet. And especially considering that religion, for it is from her that this is only an expedient, a transitional stage that must be overcome. This idea was defended by both medieval thinkers as thinkers pl